Skip to main content

AMD Radeon RX 9070 / 9070 XT review: back to winning ways

The pros and cons of DLSS 4 multi frame generation vs 4090 and 4080 Super.

Let's summarise a little here and break out benchmark results, divided into RT and non-RT. Both AMD and Nvidia have been making RT cards for over four years now, but Radeon cards have continually lagged behind their Nvidia counterparts when it comes to performance in ray-traced games. That is no longer the case, with AMD now being capable of fighting Nvidia for wins on RT performance alone, helped of course by perhaps slightly more aggressive pricing.

Across all games tested at all resolutions, I have the RTX 5070 Ti having an 8 percent RT advantage over the 9070 XT - but the AMD card comes ahead in the value stakes as the 5070 Ti's MSRP is 25 percent higher. Meanwhile, the tables turn with the non-XT vs 5070 comparison, with AMD holding a 5.5 percent RT advantage over Nvidia. Aggregating raster and RT results together - again across all resolutions - 5070 Ti beats 9070 XT by just three percent, while the 9070 non-XT bests the 5070 by nine percent.

And again, using all resolutions aggregated, we can get a sense of overall value too. The RX 9070 XT offers a touch more value than 9070, but not by as huge an amount as many might have feared. On these Sapphire models I tested at least, the deficit in boost clock between the two cards is far less pronounced in real world testing versus the spec sheet. The RTX 5070 isn't a million miles away from 9070, but the gap between the XT and the 5070 Ti is pretty vast, all things considered.

Avg Perf Differential 3840x2160 2560x1440 1920x1080
RTX 5070 Ti 105.33% 102.93% 101.83%
RX 9070 XT 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
RX 7900 XTX 99.70% 97.07% 93.04%
RTX 3090 Ti 93.95% 90.31% 88.72%
RTX 4070 Ti Super 93.34% 93.07% 93.17%
RX 9070 89.54% 90.14% 91.18%
RX 7900 XT 86.03% 86.86% 87.31%
RTX 4070 Ti 85.89% 86.93% 88.79%
RTX 3090 83.54% 81.39% 81.37%
RTX 3080 Ti 82.96% 81.10% 80.65%
RTX 5070 81.17% 82.92% 84.20%
RTX 3080 80.13% 77.14% 75.50%
RTX 4070 Super 77.56% 79.72% 81.87%

The bottom line though, in terms of hardware capabilities at least, is that AMD is back to winning ways - and this time the key compromises of subpar RT performance and relatively poor upscaling are greatly mitigated.

Of course, that only applies in games where FSR is supported, and DLSS still holds the advantage there, both in terms of the number of games that support upscaling and those that support frame generation. Similarly, AMD's Anti-Lag 2 technology is nowhere near as prevalent as Nvidia's Reflex. Nvidia's new Transformer model for upscaling is still a good deal better than AMD's best, but I wonder how long it'll take AMD to catch up given how impressive FSR 4 is for a first effort.

2560x1440 Original MSRP ($USD) $USD Per Frame
RX 9070 XT 600 6.35
RX 9070 550 6.45
RTX 5070 550 7.02
RTX 5070 Ti 750 7.71
RTX 4070 Super 600 7.96
RX 7900 GRE 550 8.20
RX 7800 XT 500 8.63
RX 7700 XT 450 8.63
RTX 5080 1000 8.72
RTX 4060 300 8.86

The Green Team can of course look towards its path tracing titles too - they do run on AMD but not to the same level of performance, even now. In addition to things like dollars per frame, these features do need to be included in any purchasing decision - though the extent to which they are important to you is a matter of taste.

Right now at least, this is the strongest AMD challenge against Nvidia I've seen in years and I look forward to seeing how the face-off continues into the budget heartlands.

AMD Radeon RX 7090 / 7090 XT Analysis